Nick Kyrgios took a brutal shot on the anti-doping authorities in a since-deleted social media submit, during which he prompt that there is no such thing as a level in conducting doping exams in tennis as a result of a failed check does not lead to a suspension.
On Tuesday, the previous world No. 13 took to X to disclose that he has had his fourth doping check over the past two months.
As proof, the Australian tennis star additionally posted the check papers, in addition to a photograph of his urine pattern.
Nevertheless it wasn’t the precise submit that drew consideration however the message that Kyrgios despatched out.
For context, he has been often calling out the dealing with of the Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek circumstances.
“Ahhhh I got randomly drug tested again today. That’s about four times in the last two months. Blood as well. Absolutely pointless as even if you test positive you can play anyway,” the 2022 Wimbledon finalist wrote in a since-deleted submit.
Nick Kyrgios submit© X
Kyrgios hit again at these criticizing his stance
Final week in Brisbane, the Australian stated the Sinner and Swiatek conditions had been “a disgusting look for tennis.”
When addressing the claims that he has gone too far in his criticism, the 29-year-old defined that if anybody may have benefited from a banned substance, it was him – contemplating that he had two surgical procedures within the final two years.
And since he thinks he has “never been a cheat,” that is why he cannot stand seeing a failed doping check with out main sanction.
“Someone like me… I would never even in my entire life ever try and dope in this sport,” Kyrgios stated in Brisbane.
“Especially going through an injury like I went through, obviously there are things out there that could speed up healing, help me get back to prime level, help my recovery.
“There’s so many issues on the market which might be prohibited in our sport that I may have been doing to get me again faster … (however) that is simply not who I’m. I am at all times in opposition to that.”
