Nick Kyrgios has achieved it once more! The Australian champion has launched new unimaginable phrases, this time aimed toward Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Andy Murray, saying that his tennis IQ is superior to that of the Fab 4.
The Australian tennis participant will return to the court docket in 2025 on the ATP 250 event in Brisbane, scheduled from December 29 to January 5, 2025. After knee issues and surgical procedure on his proper wrist that pressured him to remain out of motion for the final two years, Nick is changing into extra well-known for his – usually inappropriate – feedback on social media in the direction of his colleagues, than for his exploits on the court docket.
The previous Wimbledon finalist, this time by social media, had enjoyable constructing his good tennis participant, then praising himself for his tennis intelligence, which in his opinion is superior to the aforementioned phenomena.
“I have a higher quotient than Djokovic, Federer, Nadal and even Murray. I don’t remember other tennis players capable of reaching the Wimbledon final without a coach,” he mentioned.
Nick Kyrgios, Wimbledon 2022© Stream screenshot
Kyrgios then listed the photographs that will attraction to any tennis participant. He could not miss out on quoting himself.
“As for the serve, I choose Kyrgios: even if I’m not too tall, I think I have the best serve. As for the backhand, no doubt: Djokovic, no one plays it better than him. Then I choose Federer’s slice, De Minaur for his speed on the court and Nadal’s physique,” he added.
For as soon as, the 29-year-old stood out for a somewhat off-color assertion, which this time doesn’t characteristic Jannik Sinner, Iga Swiatek or Andy Roddick, towards whom (particularly the Italian) he has held an actual campaign in current months. Now it is the flip of the Fab 4. We’ll see when it is time for the comeback on the court docket what the opposite tennis gamers have in retailer for the Australian. Clearly, a participant like Nick is prime for tennis, throughout, each on the court docket and off the court docket.
