Evidently there arestill these – like Nikolay Davydenko – who’re caught behind the instances: that is why phrases like these of the Russian, in 2024, create embarrassment and disgrace.
The previous winner of the 2009 ATP Finals has taken up the endless controversy relating to prize cash in tournaments differentiated or equal between women and men. The previous ATP No.3 and winner of 21 ATP titles stated that males, within the Slams, work and are on the court docket way more than girls and subsequently it’s not egalitarian to pay everybody the identical.
Coco Gauff© Wta Tour / Honest Use
After an exhibition match on the event of the tip of the profession of countrywoman Elena Vesnina, the 43-year-old expressed in a really articulate manner the problem of prizes in tennis and the problem of equal pay between ATP and WTA, talking to the media Match TV.
“In tournaments of the 250, 500, 1000 categories it is possible that there are the same prizes. But when we talk about Grand Slam tournaments the same argument does not apply. Women never play five-set matches.
Serena Williams, for example, during her career has won certain Grand Slam tournaments, losing only 10 games during the whole tournament. Not in a single match, I mean in the whole tournament. She has won many sets 6-0 or 6-1 or 6-2 without even sweating or using up energy.
And men instead often lose 10 games only in the first match when things go very well, we have to fight. Sometimes you play five sets in the first round and then you lose. Male tennis players work three times harder than female tennis players in this type of tournament. It is so it’s unfair to pay them the same,” defined the Russian, attempting to argue his controversial perspective.
Clearly the controversy on the problem has been very heated for years: there have already been the primary indicators of settlement, which ought to result in equal prize cash for women and men, within the close to future. Or not less than that is what we hope. That is why the Russian’s phrases appear to come back from one other period, changing into fully extemporaneous within the context that we dwell in at this second in historical past.
